| 1. |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
| 1.1. |
Introduction to Sensor Technology |
| 1.2. |
Overview of major sensor technology markets |
| 1.3. |
Many multi-billion-dollar electronics companies compete for the established sensor market – but their revenue share can be comparable to more specialist players |
| 1.4. |
Total Sensor Market 2025-2035: Annual Revenue (USD, Billions) |
| 1.5. |
Total Sensor Market 2025-2035: Annual Revenue (USD, Millions) – Granular Breakdown |
| 1.6. |
Connecting operating principles, metrics and manufacturing formats |
| 1.7. |
Key drivers and global-trends impacting the sensor market |
| 1.8. |
Sensor technology market roadmap |
| 1.9. |
Overview of key sensor technology innovations and applications for future markets |
| 2. |
MARKET FORECASTS |
| 2.1. |
Market Forecasts: Methodology Outline |
| 2.2. |
Sensor Market Categories included in these forecasts |
| 2.3. |
Total Sensor Market 2025-2035: Annual Revenue (USD, Billions) |
| 2.4. |
Total Sensor Market 2025-2035: Annual Revenue (USD, Millions) – Granular Breakdown |
| 2.5. |
Established Sensor Market: Ten-year gas sensor technology forecast (2025-2035), annual revenue (USD, Millions) |
| 2.6. |
Established Sensor Market: Ten-year semiconductor sensor technology forecast (2025-2035), annual revenue (USD, Millions) |
| 2.7. |
Established Sensor Market: Ten-year automotive and aerospace sensor technology forecast (2025-2035), annual revenue (USD, Millions) |
| 2.8. |
Established Sensor Market: Ten-year biosensor sensor technology forecast (2025-2035), annual revenue (USD, Millions) |
| 2.9. |
Emerging Sensor Market: Ten-year quantum sensor technology forecast (2025-2035), annual revenue (USD, Millions) |
| 2.10. |
Emerging Sensor Market: Ten-year silicon photonic sensor technology forecast (2025-2035), annual revenue (USD, Millions) |
| 2.11. |
Emerging Sensor Market: Ten-year printed sensor technology forecast (2025-2035), annual revenue (USD, Millions) |
| 2.12. |
Emerging Sensor Market: Ten-year emerging image sensor technology forecast (2025-2035), annual revenue (USD, Millions) |
| 2.13. |
Emerging Sensor Market: Ten-year sensors for future mobility forecast (2025-2035), annual revenue (USD, Millions); LiDAR, RADAR, CAMERA, IR and in-cabin-sensing |
| 2.14. |
Total Sensor Market 2025-2035: Annual Revenue (USD, Millions) – Data Table |
| 3. |
INTRODUCTION |
| 3.1. |
Introduction to the Sensor Market – Chapter Overview |
| 3.2. |
Introduction to Sensor Technology |
| 3.3. |
Overview of major sensor technology markets |
| 3.4. |
Many multi-billion-dollar electronics companies compete for the established sensor market – but their revenue share can be comparable to more specialist players |
| 3.5. |
Overview of some typical sensor technology product categories |
| 3.6. |
Connecting operating principles, metrics and manufacturing formats |
| 3.7. |
General trends separating emerging and established sensor tech |
| 3.8. |
Key drivers and global-trends impacting the sensor market |
| 3.9. |
Sensor technology market roadmap |
| 3.10. |
Overview of key sensor technology innovations and applications for future markets |
| 3.11. |
What are the mega trends in future mobility? |
| 3.12. |
What is the role of sensors in future mobility technology? |
| 3.13. |
Near term IoT markets trends set to revolve around edge sensing as the industry shifts from the cloud to the edge |
| 3.14. |
Roadmap of the mega-trends in wearable technology |
| 3.15. |
Overview of the landscape for wearable sensor innovation |
| 3.16. |
Introduction to 6G and expected improvements in sensing compared to 5G |
| 3.17. |
Overview of 6G applications beyond mobile communications – including THz sensing and imaging |
| 3.18. |
The value proposition of mmWave and THz frequencies for sensing |
| 3.19. |
Key conclusions on the sensor technology market: technologies and trends |
| 4. |
NEXT GENERATION SENSOR TECHNOLOGY INNOVATIONS |
| 4.1. |
Chapter Overview and Related IDTechEx Reports |
| 4.2. |
Emerging Image Sensors |
| 4.2.1. |
Overview of the Emerging Image Sensors Section |
| 4.2.2. |
Emerging image sensors: summary of key conclusions |
| 4.2.3. |
Emerging image sensors: Key players overview (I) |
| 4.2.4. |
Emerging image sensors: Key players overview (II) |
| 4.2.5. |
SWIR imaging: overview and key conclusions |
| 4.2.6. |
SWIR imaging: emerging technology options |
| 4.2.7. |
SWIR sensors: applications and key players |
| 4.2.8. |
OPD-on-CMOS hybrid image sensors: overview, conclusions and key players |
| 4.2.9. |
OPD-on-CMOS detectors: technology readiness level roadmap by application |
| 4.2.10. |
QD-on-Si/QD-on-CMOS imaging: fundamentals, value proposition and key conclusions |
| 4.2.11. |
Hyperspectral imaging: overview and key conclusions |
| 4.2.12. |
Hyperspectral imaging: wavelength range vs spectral resolution |
| 4.2.13. |
Miniaturized spectrometers: overview and key conclusions |
| 4.2.14. |
Miniaturized spectrometers: targeting a wide range of sectors |
| 4.2.15. |
Miniaturized spectrometers: key players and key differentiators |
| 4.2.16. |
Event-based sensing: overview and key conclusions |
| 4.2.17. |
Event-based vision: application requirements |
| 4.2.18. |
LIDAR: overview of operating principles |
| 4.2.19. |
LIDAR: value proposition |
| 4.2.20. |
LIDAR: Technology Challenges |
| 4.2.21. |
LIDAR: ecosystem and key players |
| 4.3. |
Gas Sensors |
| 4.3.1. |
Overview of the gas sensor section and analyst viewpoint |
| 4.3.2. |
The gas sensor market ‘at a glance’ |
| 4.3.3. |
Gas Sensor Market Summary: Drivers for change? |
| 4.3.4. |
Overview of Metal Oxide (MOx) gas sensors |
| 4.3.5. |
Identifying key MOx sensors manufacturers |
| 4.3.6. |
Key conclusions and SWOT analysis of MOx gas sensors |
| 4.3.7. |
Introduction to electrochemical gas sensors |
| 4.3.8. |
Major manufacturers of electrochemical sensors |
| 4.3.9. |
Key conclusions and SWOT analysis of electrochemical gas sensors |
| 4.3.10. |
Introduction to infrared gas sensors |
| 4.3.11. |
Identifying key infra-red gas sensor manufacturers |
| 4.3.12. |
Key conclusions and SWOT analysis of infra-red gas sensors |
| 4.3.13. |
Introduction to photoionization detectors (PID) |
| 4.3.14. |
Categorization of ionization detector manufacturers |
| 4.3.15. |
Key conclusions and SWOT analysis of photo-ionization detectors |
| 4.3.16. |
Optical Particle Counter |
| 4.3.17. |
Identifying key optical particle counter manufacturers |
| 4.3.18. |
SWOT analysis of Optical Particle Counters |
| 4.3.19. |
Key Conclusions: Optical particle counters |
| 4.3.20. |
Principle of Sensing: Photoacoustic |
| 4.3.21. |
Sensirion and Infineon offer a miniaturized photo-acoustic carbon dioxide sensor |
| 4.3.22. |
SWOT analysis of photo acoustic gas sensors |
| 4.3.23. |
Principle of Sensing: E-Nose |
| 4.3.24. |
Advantages and disadvantaged of sensor types for E-Nose |
| 4.3.25. |
Categorization of e-nose manufacturers |
| 4.3.26. |
SWOT analysis of E-noses |
| 4.3.27. |
E-nose Summary: Specific aromas a better opportunity than a nose |
| 4.4. |
Printed and Flexible Sensors |
| 4.4.1. |
Introduction to the printed and flexible sensor market |
| 4.4.2. |
Summary of key growth markets for printed sensor technology |
| 4.4.3. |
Key takeaways segmented by printed/flexible sensor technology |
| 4.4.4. |
Piezoresistive Sensors: Market map of applications and players |
| 4.4.5. |
Challenges facing printed piezoelectric sensors |
| 4.4.6. |
Readiness level snapshot of printed piezoelectric sensors |
| 4.4.7. |
Conclusions for printed and flexible piezoelectric sensors |
| 4.4.8. |
Opportunities for printed photodetectors in large area flexible sensing |
| 4.4.9. |
Supplier overview: Thin film photodetectors |
| 4.4.10. |
Conclusions for printed and flexible image sensors |
| 4.4.11. |
Printed temperature sensors continue to attract interest for thermal management applications |
| 4.4.12. |
Printed temperature sensor supplier overview |
| 4.4.13. |
Technology readiness level snapshot of printed temperature sensors |
| 4.4.14. |
Conclusions for printed and flexible temperature sensors |
| 4.4.15. |
Opportunities for printed strain sensors could expand beyond motion capture into battery management long term |
| 4.4.16. |
Capacitive strain sensor value & supply chain |
| 4.4.17. |
Summary: Strain sensors |
| 4.4.18. |
Outlook for printed gas sensor technology |
| 4.4.19. |
ITO coating innovations and indium price stabilization impact printed capacitive sensor growth markets |
| 4.4.20. |
Readiness level of printed capacitive touch sensors materials and technologies |
| 4.4.21. |
Conformal and curved surface touch sensing applications emerge for printed capacitive sensors |
| 4.4.22. |
Conclusions for printed and flexible capacitive touch sensors |
| 4.4.23. |
Opportunities for printed electrodes in the wearables market |
| 4.4.24. |
Printed sensors in flexible hybrid electronics |
| 4.4.25. |
SWOT analysis for each printed sensor category (I) |
| 4.4.26. |
SWOT analysis for each printed sensor category (II) |
| 4.4.27. |
SWOT analysis for each printed sensor category (III) |
| 4.5. |
Silicon Photonics |
| 4.5.1. |
What are Photonic Integrated Circuits (PICs)? |
| 4.5.2. |
Advantages and Challenges of Photonic Integrated Circuits |
| 4.5.3. |
Key Current & Future Photonic Integrated Circuits Applications |
| 4.5.4. |
Opportunities for PIC Sensors: Biomedical |
| 4.5.5. |
Market players developing PIC Biosensors |
| 4.5.6. |
Opportunities for PIC Sensors: Gas Sensors |
| 4.5.7. |
Market players developing PIC-based Gas Sensors |
| 4.5.8. |
Opportunities for PIC Sensors: Structural Health Sensors |
| 4.5.9. |
Market players developing Spectroscopy PICs |
| 4.5.10. |
Opportunities for PIC Sensors: LiDAR Sensors |
| 4.5.11. |
Core Aspects of LiDAR |
| 4.5.12. |
Market players developing PIC-based LiDAR (1) |
| 4.5.13. |
Market players developing PIC-based LiDAR (2) |
| 4.5.14. |
LiDAR Wavelength and Material Trends |
| 4.5.15. |
Major challenges of PIC-based FMCW lidars |
| 4.6. |
Quantum Sensors |
| 4.6.1. |
What are quantum sensors? |
| 4.6.2. |
The quantum sensor market ‘at a glance’ |
| 4.6.3. |
Quantum sensors: Analyst viewpoint |
| 4.6.4. |
Quantum sensor industry market map |
| 4.6.5. |
Atomic clocks self-calibrate for clock drift |
| 4.6.6. |
Atomic Clocks: SWOT analysis |
| 4.6.7. |
Atomic clocks: Sector roadmap |
| 4.6.8. |
Sensitivity is key to the value proposition for quantum magnetic field sensors |
| 4.6.9. |
Operating principles of Optically Pumped Magnetometers (OPMs) |
| 4.6.10. |
OPMs: SWOT analysis |
| 4.6.11. |
Introduction to N-V center magnetic field sensors |
| 4.6.12. |
N-V Center Magnetic Field Sensors: SWOT analysis |
| 4.6.13. |
Quantum magnetometers: Sector roadmap |
| 4.6.14. |
Quantum gravimeters: Chapter overview |
| 4.6.15. |
Operating principles of atomic interferometry-based quantum gravimeters |
| 4.6.16. |
Quantum Gravimeters: SWOT analysis |
| 4.6.17. |
Quantum gravimeters: Sector roadmap |
| 4.6.18. |
Quantum gyroscopes: Chapter overview |
| 4.6.19. |
Operating principles of atomic quantum gyroscopes |
| 4.6.20. |
MEMS manufacturing processes can miniaturize atomic gyroscope technology for higher volume applications |
| 4.6.21. |
Quantum gyroscopes: Sector roadmap |
| 4.6.22. |
Overview of Quantum Image Sensors |
| 4.7. |
Biosensors |
| 4.7.1. |
Layout of a biosensor |
| 4.7.2. |
Bioreceptors: benefits and drawbacks of each type |
| 4.7.3. |
Optical transducers: benefits and drawbacks of each type |
| 4.7.4. |
Electrochemical transducers: benefits and drawbacks of each type |
| 4.7.5. |
Applications for biosensors at the point-of-care |
| 4.7.6. |
In vitro diagnostics |
| 4.7.7. |
Growing market for in vitro diagnostics |
| 4.7.8. |
The value of point-of-care testing |
| 4.7.9. |
In vitro diagnostics trending toward point-of-care testing (POCT) |
| 4.7.10. |
Mechanism of the lateral flow assay |
| 4.7.11. |
Minimalizing sample handling with integrated cartridges |
| 4.7.12. |
Value ecosystem of POCT devices |
| 4.7.13. |
Market dynamics |
| 4.8. |
Nanocarbon Sensors |
| 4.8.1. |
Expanding graphene wafer capacity and adoption |
| 4.8.2. |
Structural health monitoring |
| 4.8.3. |
Gas sensors |
| 4.8.4. |
Temperature and humidity sensors |
| 4.8.5. |
Emerging role in silicon photonics |
| 4.8.6. |
Outlook for carbon materials in sensors |
| 5. |
EDGE SENSING AND AI |
| 5.1. |
Edge sensing: Introduction |
| 5.1.1. |
Edge sensing: Chapter overview |
| 5.1.2. |
What is edge sensing |
| 5.1.3. |
Edge versus cloud computing for emerging sensor applications |
| 5.1.4. |
The rise of edge sensing tracks with a broader industry shift from cloud to edge computing |
| 5.1.5. |
Market drivers for edge sensing |
| 5.2. |
Edge sensing: Technologies |
| 5.2.1. |
Edge sensors: Technical breakdown and key components |
| 5.2.2. |
Edge sensing internet of things architecture |
| 5.2.3. |
Evaluating cloud, edge, and endpoint sensing and associated enabling technologies |
| 5.2.4. |
High efficiency computing hardware has unlocked edge sensing |
| 5.2.5. |
Low-power designs are critical for edge sensor devices |
| 5.2.6. |
Case study: Low-power edge sensor asset tracker |
| 5.2.7. |
Edge sensing and edge AI are converging and will unlock predictive and proscriptive functionality |
| 5.2.8. |
Edge AI enables data processing and inference on endpoint devices |
| 5.2.9. |
Challenges facing edge sensors |
| 5.3. |
Edge sensing: Markets and applications |
| 5.3.1. |
Edge sensors: Market overview |
| 5.3.2. |
Opportunity for improving energy efficiency in smart buildings with building automation |
| 5.3.3. |
Edge sensors enabling low-power occupancy monitoring and smart security |
| 5.3.4. |
Edge sensing will unlock predictive maintenance in industrial IoT |
| 5.3.5. |
Roadmap of the evolving role of sensors in industrial IoT |
| 5.3.6. |
Richer structural health monitoring insight with edge AI-enabled sensing |
| 5.3.7. |
Edge sensors can improve workplace safety in remote and hazardous locations |
| 5.3.8. |
AI-enabled edge sensing in wearables |
| 5.3.9. |
Edge sensor and edge AI promise continues innovation in established consumer electronics applications and smart retail |
| 5.3.10. |
Evaluation of edge sensing application requirements |
| 5.3.11. |
Key edge sensor markets: Emerging applications, opportunities and threats |
| 5.4. |
Edge sensing: Conclusions |
| 5.4.1. |
Summary of edge sensor technologies and market outlook |
| 5.4.2. |
Technology readiness level of edge sensor applications |
| 5.4.3. |
SWOT analysis of edge sensors and edge AI |
| 5.4.4. |
Key players in edge sensing: Sensors and product integrators |
| 5.4.5. |
Key players in edge sensing: IC, SoC, and cloud service suppliers |
| 6. |
WEARABLE SENSORS |
| 6.1. |
Overview of the wearable sensors section and technology landscape |
| 6.1.1. |
Wearable technology takes many form factors |
| 6.1.2. |
Overview of wearable sensor types |
| 6.1.3. |
Connecting form factors, wearable sensors and metrics |
| 6.1.4. |
Roadmap of wearable sensor technology segmented by key biometrics (1) |
| 6.1.5. |
Roadmap of wearable sensor technology segmented by key biometrics |
| 6.1.6. |
Wearable devices for medical and wellness applications increasingly overlap |
| 6.2. |
Wearable Motion Sensors |
| 6.2.1. |
Wearable motion sensors: introduction |
| 6.2.2. |
IMUs for smart-watches: major players and industry dynamic |
| 6.2.3. |
Wearable magnetometer suppliers and industry dynamic |
| 6.2.4. |
Overview of emerging use-cases for wearable motion sensors |
| 6.2.5. |
MEMS-based IMUs for wearable motion sensing: |
| 6.2.6. |
SWOT Analysis |
| 6.2.7. |
Wearable motion sensors: sector roadmap |
| 6.2.8. |
MEMS-based IMUs for wearable motion sensing: |
| 6.2.9. |
Outlook |
| 6.3. |
Wearable Optical Sensors |
| 6.3.1. |
Wearable optical sensors: introduction |
| 6.3.2. |
Wearable optical sensors: photoplethysmography (PPG) |
| 6.3.3. |
Wearable PPG: applications and key players |
| 6.3.4. |
Wearable optical sensors: obtaining blood oxygen from PPG |
| 6.3.5. |
Wearable optical sensors: market outlook and technology readiness of pulse oximetery |
| 6.3.6. |
Wearable optical sensors: progress of non-invasive blood pressure sensing |
| 6.3.7. |
Wearable optical sensors: overview of technologies for cuff-less blood pressure |
| 6.3.8. |
Wearable optical sensors: SWOT Analysis for heart-rate, pulse-ox, blood pressure and glucose monitoring |
| 6.3.9. |
Wearable optical sensors: key conclusions |
| 6.4. |
Wearable Electrodes |
| 6.4.1. |
Wearable electrodes: overview of key types |
| 6.4.2. |
Wearable electrodes: wet vs dry |
| 6.4.3. |
Wearable electrodes: microneedles |
| 6.4.4. |
Wearable electrodes: electronic skins (also known as ‘epidermal electronics’) |
| 6.4.5. |
Wearable electrodes: applications and product types |
| 6.4.6. |
Wearable electrodes: key players |
| 6.4.7. |
Wearable electrodes: consolidated SWOT analysis |
| 6.4.8. |
Wearable electrodes: key conclusions |
| 6.5. |
Wearable Temperature Sensors |
| 6.5.1. |
Wearable temperature sensors: introduction |
| 6.5.2. |
Wearable body temperature sensors: key players, form factors and applications |
| 6.5.3. |
Wearable temperature sensors: sector roadmap |
| 6.5.4. |
Wearable temperature sensors: SWOT analysis |
| 6.5.5. |
Wearable temperature sensors: key conclusions |
| 6.6. |
Wearable CGMs |
| 6.6.1. |
Wearable Chemical Sensors: overview |
| 6.6.2. |
Wearable chemical sensors: analyte selection and availability |
| 6.6.3. |
Wearable chemical sensors: operating principle typical CGM device |
| 6.6.4. |
CGM: overview of key players |
| 6.6.5. |
Wearable glucose sensors SWOT analysis of chemical vs. alternatives |
| 6.6.6. |
Wearable chemical sensors: roadmap for glucose sensing and key conclusions |
| 6.6.7. |
Wearable chemical sensors: use-cases, stakeholders, key players and SWOT analysis of wearable alcohol sensors |
| 6.6.8. |
Wearable chemical sensors: use-cases, stakeholders, key players and SWOT analysis of wearable lactate/lactic acid sensors |
| 6.6.9. |
Wearable chemical sensors: use-cases, stakeholders, key players and SWOT analysis of wearable hydration sensors |
| 6.6.10. |
Market readiness of wearable sensors for novel biometrics |
| 6.6.11. |
Wearable sensors for novel biometrics: key conclusions |
| 6.7. |
Sensors for XR |
| 6.7.1. |
What are VR, AR, MR and XR? |
| 6.7.2. |
Controllers and sensing connect XR devices to the environment and the user |
| 6.7.3. |
Beyond positional tracking: What else might XR headsets track? |
| 6.7.4. |
Where are XR sensors located? |
| 6.7.5. |
3D imaging and motion capture |
| 6.7.6. |
Stereoscopic vision |
| 6.7.7. |
Time of Flight (ToF) cameras for depth sensing |
| 6.7.8. |
Structured light |
| 6.7.9. |
Comparison of 3D imaging technologies |
| 6.7.10. |
Sensors for XR: Positional and motion tracking, sector roadmap |
| 6.7.11. |
Why is eye tracking important for AR/VR devices? |
| 6.7.12. |
Eye tracking sensor categories |
| 6.7.13. |
Eye tracking using cameras with machine vision |
| 6.7.14. |
Eye tracking companies based on conventional/NIR cameras and machine vision software |
| 6.7.15. |
Sensors for XR: Event-based vision for AR/VR eye tracking |
| 6.7.16. |
Sensors for XR: eye tracking with laser scanning MEMS |
| 6.7.17. |
Sensors for XR: capacitive sensing of eye movement |
| 6.7.18. |
Eye tracking for XR: sector roadmap |
| 7. |
SENSORS FOR FUTURE MOBILITY MARKETS |
| 7.1. |
Future Mobility Megatrends |
| 7.1.1. |
What are the mega trends in future mobility? |
| 7.1.2. |
Chapter Overview |
| 7.1.3. |
Summary and outlook for sensors in future mobility applications |
| 7.1.4. |
Main conclusions: Sensors for Future Mobility Markets |
| 7.2. |
Sensors for Electrification |
| 7.2.1. |
Electric Vehicles: Basic Principle |
| 7.2.2. |
Monitoring current, voltage, time and temperature is core to BMS functionality |
| 7.2.3. |
Trends in battery management systems – sensors most relevant to greater sophistication in state estimation |
| 7.2.4. |
Sensors play an evolving role in EV charging infrastructure |
| 7.2.5. |
The rise of the EV could shift the role of gas sensors from emissions testing to battery management |
| 7.2.6. |
Value proposition of gas sensors on battery monitoring: Early thermal runaway detection |
| 7.2.7. |
Comparing approaches to commercializing gas sensors for battery monitoring |
| 7.3. |
Sensors for Automation |
| 7.3.1. |
SAE Levels of Automation in Cars |
| 7.3.2. |
The Big Three Sensors |
| 7.3.3. |
Sensor Requirements for Different Levels of Autonomy |
| 7.3.4. |
Sensor Suite Costs |
| 7.3.5. |
Front Radar and Side Radar Applications |
| 7.3.6. |
Vehicle Camera Applications |
| 7.3.7. |
LiDARs in Automotive Applications |
| 7.3.8. |
The IR Spectrum and autonomy applications |
| 7.3.9. |
Key Components of a Thermal Camera |
| 7.3.10. |
Uncooled Sensor Material Choice Summary |
| 7.3.11. |
Microbolometer Suppliers and Materials |
| 7.3.12. |
Chalcogenide Glass Suppliers |
| 7.3.13. |
Summary of NHTSA Ruling |
| 7.3.14. |
Autoliv, Veoneer and Magna Night Vision Generations |
| 7.3.15. |
LWIR for ADAS |
| 7.3.16. |
LWIR for ADAS: Advantages and Disadvantages |
| 7.3.17. |
Thermal Camera Placement |
| 7.3.18. |
Summary of Microbolometer, Camera, and Tier-One Suppliers |
| 7.4. |
In-Cabin Sensing (or Interior Monitoring Systems) |
| 7.4.1. |
Interior Monitoring System (IMS), Driver-MS and Occupant-MS |
| 7.4.2. |
Evolution of DMS Sensor Suite from SAE Level 1 to Level 4 |
| 7.4.3. |
Current Technologies for Interior Monitoring System (IMS) |
| 7.4.4. |
IMS Sensing Technologies: Passive and Active |
| 7.4.5. |
Overview of In-Cabin Sensors by OEM (1) |
| 7.4.6. |
Overview of In-Cabin Sensors by OEM (2) |
| 7.4.7. |
Sensor adoption for in-cabin monitoring anticipated to remain dominated by established vision based, capacitive and torque sensor technologies |
| 7.4.8. |
Infrared (IR) in DMS – Overview |
| 7.4.9. |
ToF Camera for In-Cabin Sensing – Principles |
| 7.4.10. |
Introduction to Radar Technology |
| 7.4.11. |
Current Status of Capacitive Sensors in DMS |
| 7.4.12. |
Torque Sensor for HOD – Working Principles |
| 7.4.13. |
In-Cabin Sensing Technology Overview |
| 7.5. |
Sensors for Connected Vehicles and Software Defined Vehicles |
| 7.5.1. |
Software-Defined Vehicle Level Guide |
| 7.5.2. |
Connected Vehicles Key Terminology |
| 7.5.3. |
Certain V2V/V2I use cases highlight the interplay between connected vehicles and autonomy – and as such the role of sensors. |
| 8. |
SENSORS FOR THE INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT) |
| 8.1. |
Introduction |
| 8.1.1. |
What is internet-of-things (IoT)? |
| 8.1.2. |
Sensors represent just one element within an IoT platform |
| 8.1.3. |
Emerging IoT markets and applications |
| 8.1.4. |
IoT technology meta-trends and impact on sensors |
| 8.2. |
Industrial IoT (IIoT) |
| 8.2.1. |
Industrial IoT: Introduction |
| 8.2.2. |
Industrial trends and Industry 5.0 |
| 8.2.3. |
Industrial IoT: Key emerging sensor applications |
| 8.2.4. |
IIoT sensors: Industrial robotics and automation |
| 8.2.5. |
IIoT sensors: Machine monitoring and predictive maintenance |
| 8.2.6. |
IIoT sensors: Worker safety |
| 8.2.7. |
IIoT sensors: inventory management and logistics |
| 8.2.8. |
IIoT sensors: Conclusions and outlook |
| 8.3. |
Environmental Monitoring IoT |
| 8.3.1. |
Overview of environmental gas sensor markets within IoT |
| 8.3.2. |
Environmental Monitoring IoT: Outdoor Pollution |
| 8.3.3. |
Environmental Monitoring IoT: Indoor Air Quality |
| 8.3.4. |
Environmental Monitoring IoT: Sensors for PFAS |
| 8.4. |
Consumer IoT: Smart Home (Air Quality Sensors) |
| 8.4.1. |
Smart Home technology OEMs are still betting on it going ‘mainstream’ |
| 8.4.2. |
Introduction to the Smart Home market for indoor air quality monitoring |
| 8.4.3. |
How can OEMs access the mass market for indoor air quality monitors post-covid? |
| 8.4.4. |
Comparing technology specs of smart-home air quality monitors |
| 8.4.5. |
Smart purifiers are an increasingly popular solution for poor air quality |
| 8.4.6. |
Market leaders include particulate matter sensors in product offerings |
| 8.4.7. |
Air quality and the internet of things |
| 8.4.8. |
Which business models for indoor air quality products are sustainable? |
| 8.4.9. |
Opportunity for air quality monitoring within wellness and fitness monitoring remains |
| 8.4.10. |
Relationship between air quality regulations and technology |
| 8.4.11. |
Smart-home indoor air quality monitoring: market map and outlook |
| 8.4.12. |
Comparing device costs of smart-home technology for IAQ monitoring |
| 8.4.13. |
Challenges for indoor air quality devices in the smart-home |
| 8.4.14. |
Miniaturized gas sensors for indoor monitoring in smart home: conclusions and outlook |
| 9. |
COMPANY PROFILES |
| 9. |
COMPANY PROFILES |
| 9.1. |
Adsentec |
| 9.2. |
Airthings |
| 9.3. |
Alphasense |
| 9.4. |
Bosch Aviation Technology |
| 9.5. |
Bosch Sensortec – Gas Sensors |
| 9.6. |
Brilliant Matters |
| 9.7. |
Carester (Caremag) |
| 9.8. |
Cerca Magnetics |
| 9.9. |
Cubert |
| 9.10. |
Cubic Sensor and Instrument Co., Ltd. |
| 9.11. |
Datwyler (Dry Electrodes) |
| 9.12. |
DD Scientific Ltd. |
| 9.13. |
EarSwitch |
| 9.14. |
Emberion: Cameras With Extended Spectral Band |
| 9.15. |
Epicore Biosystems |
| 9.16. |
Excelitas |
| 9.17. |
Eyeris |
| 9.18. |
FLEXOO |
| 9.19. |
Foresight Automotive |
| 9.20. |
Fraunhofer FEP |
| 9.21. |
Gamaya |
| 9.22. |
HyProMag Ltd |
| 9.23. |
IDUN Technologies |
| 9.24. |
Infi-Tex |
| 9.25. |
ioAirFlow |
| 9.26. |
Jungo Connectivity |
| 9.27. |
Kaiterra |
| 9.28. |
Loomia |
| 9.29. |
Mateligent GmbH |
| 9.30. |
Mobileye: Automotive Radar |
| 9.31. |
Naox Technologies |
| 9.32. |
Noveon Magnetics |
| 9.33. |
OmniVision Technologies |
| 9.34. |
Peratech |
| 9.35. |
PKVitality |
| 9.36. |
Q.ANT |
| 9.37. |
Remedee Labs |
| 9.38. |
Rhaeos Inc |
| 9.39. |
Seeing Machines |
| 9.40. |
Sefar |
| 9.41. |
Sensel |
| 9.42. |
Sensirion |
| 9.43. |
Siemens Healthineers |
| 9.44. |
Silveray |
| 9.45. |
ST Microelectronics |
| 9.46. |
Teledyne FLIR |
| 9.47. |
Useful Sensors |
| 9.48. |
Valencell |
| 9.49. |
Valeo |
| 9.50. |
Veoneer (Qualcomm) |
| 9.51. |
Wearable Devices Ltd. |
| 9.52. |
Wormsensing |
| 9.53. |
Zimmer and Peacock |
More Stories
Researchers Reveal Molecular Secrets of Flexible Electronics
Growth Outweighs Uncertainty for Flexible and Printed Electronics: OE-A Survey
SEMI FlexTech Announces 2026 FLEXI Award Winners