April 18, 2026

Flex Tech

Innovation in Every Curve

4A tetrahedron system: a synergistic framework for panvascular intervention empowered by flexible electronics

4A tetrahedron system: a synergistic framework for panvascular intervention empowered by flexible electronics
  • Zhou, X., Yu, L., Zhao, Y. & Ge, J. Panvascular medicine: an emerging discipline focusing on atherosclerotic diseases. Eur. Heart J. 43, 4528–4531 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • GBD 2021 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators Global incidence, prevalence, years lived with disability (YLDs), disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 371 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet 403, 2133–2161 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, W. & Yi, X. Advancements and future prospects in the study of panvascular disease. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 89, 198–204 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, M. & Secemsky, E. A. Atherectomy vs other modalities for treatment during peripheral vascular intervention. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 24, 869–877 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schartz, D. et al. Impact of aspiration catheter size on clinical outcomes in aspiration thrombectomy. J. Neurointerv. Surg. 15, e111–e116 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • You, L., Luo, Y., Cheng, Q., Shen, L. & Ge, J. High-suitcordance intelligent fibers for panvascular disease monitoring-intervention. Adv. Fiber Mater. 7, 1042–1072 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, Z. et al. Inkjet printing for flexible electronics: materials, processes and equipments. Chin. Sci. Bull. 55, 3383–3407 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, J. A., Someya, T. & Huang, Y. Materials and mechanics for stretchable electronics. Science 327, 1603–1607 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, J. K. et al. Stretchable colour-sensitive quantum dot nanocomposites for shape-tunable multiplexed phototransistor arrays. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 849–856 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. et al. A shape-morphing cortex-adhesive sensor for closed-loop transcranial ultrasound neurostimulation. Nat. Electron. 7, 800–814 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang, J. et al. Reconfigurable assembly of self-healing stretchable transistors and circuits for integrated systems. Nat. Electron. 8, 474–484 (2025).

  • Jung, H. et al. Hydrogel–elastomer-based conductive nanomembranes for soft bioelectronics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 20, 1822–1830 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Veletić, M. et al. Implants with sensing capabilities. Chem. Rev. 122, 16329–16363 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, W., Ota, H., Kiriya, D., Takei, K. & Javey, A. Flexible electronics toward wearable sensing. Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 523–533 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. et al. Flexible wearable sensors for cardiovascular health monitoring. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 10, 2100116 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, K. et al. A battery-less wireless implant for the continuous monitoring of vascular pressure, flow rate and temperature. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 7, 1215–1228 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, H. et al. Injectable ultrasonic sensor for wireless monitoring of intracranial signals. Nature 630, 84–90 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L. et al. Tracking peripheral artery motion and vascular resistance with a multimodal wearable sensor under pressure perturbations. J. Biomech. Eng. 144, 081003 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haghi, M., Thurow, K. & Stoll, R. Wearable devices in medical internet of things: scientific research and commercially available devices. Healthc. Inform. Res. 23, 4–15 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubala, V., Harris, L. F., Ricco, A. J., Tan, M. X. & Williams, D. E. Point of care diagnostics: status and future. Anal. Chem. 84, 487–515 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahmani, S. et al. 3D-printed microneedles in biomedical applications. iScience 24, 102012 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vora, L. K. et al. Microneedle-based biosensing. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 2, 64–81 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y., Chatzilakou, E., Pan, Z., Traverso, G. & Yetisen, A. K. Microneedle sensors for point-of-care diagnostics. Adv. Sci. (Weinh.) 11, e2306560 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedel, M. et al. Opportunities and challenges in the diagnostic utility of dermal interstitial fluid. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 7, 1541–1555 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., Yang, B., Kong, J., Zhang, Y. & Fang, X. Real-time monitoring and early warning of a cytokine storm in vivo using a wearable noninvasive skin microneedle patch. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 12, e2203133 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, L., Zhu, D., Xiao, Y., Zheng, X. & Chen, P. Microneedle coupled epidermal sensor for multiplexed electrochemical detection of kidney disease biomarkers. Biosens. Bioelectron. 237, 115506 (2023). 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X. et al. 3D-assembled microneedle ion sensor-based wearable system for the transdermal monitoring of physiological ion fluctuations. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 9, 25 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ju, J., Li, L., Regmi, S., Zhang, X. & Tang, S. Microneedle-based glucose sensor platform: from vitro to wearable point-of-care testing systems. Biosensors. (Basel) 12, 606 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawson, T. M. et al. Microneedle biosensors for real-time, minimally invasive drug monitoring of phenoxymethylpenicillin: a first-in-human evaluation in healthy volunteers. Lancet Digit.al Health 1, e335–e343 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z. et al. Electrochemical detection of cholesterol in human biofluid using microneedle sensor. J. Mater. Chem. B 11, 6075–6081 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dervisevic, M. et al. Wearable microneedle array-based sensor for transdermal monitoring of pH levels in interstitial fluid. Biosens. Bioelectron. 222, 114955 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. et al. Interstitial fluid biomarkers’ minimally invasive monitoring using microneedle sensor arrays. Anal. Chem. 94, 968–974 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Puttaswamy, S. V. et al. Nanophotonic-carbohydrate lab-on-a-microneedle for rapid detection of human cystatin C in finger-prick blood. ACS Nano 14, 11939–11949 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J. et al. Microneedle-based integrated pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation platform for personalized medicine. Nat. Commun. 16, 6260 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranamukhaarachchi, S. A. et al. Integrated hollow microneedle-optofluidic biosensor for therapeutic drug monitoring in sub-nanoliter volumes. Sci. Rep. 6, 29075 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, J., Zhou, X., Libanori, A. & Sun, W. Microneedle-based bioassays. Nanoscale Adv. 2, 4295–4304 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, K. et al. A wearable dual-modal patch for rapid pre-hospital diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. ACS Nano 19, 23969–23981 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, A. et al. Integration of chemical and physical inputs for monitoring metabolites and cardiac signals in diabetes. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 10, 94–109 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutys, M. L. & Chen, C. S. Forces and mechanotransduction in 3D vascular biology. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 42, 73–79 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trimm, E. & Red-Horse, K. Vascular endothelial cell development and diversity. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 20, 197–210 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, J., Yang, Y., Cheng, A., Xu, G. & He, F. Metabolism of vascular smooth muscle cells in vascular diseases. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 319, H613–H631 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, K., Nguyen, H. N. & Brenner, M. B. Fibroblast pathology in inflammatory diseases. J. Clin. Invest. 131, e149538 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chistiakov, D. A. et al. Mechanisms of foam cell formation in atherosclerosis. J. Mol. Med. (Berl.) 95, 1153–1165 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. S. & Banka, G. In-stent restenosis. Interv. Cardiol. Clin. 5, 211–220 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauri, L. et al. Relationship of late loss in lumen diameter to coronary restenosis in sirolimus-eluting stents. Circulation 111, 321–327 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Assadsangabi, B., Hsiang, Y. & Takahata, K. Enabling angioplasty-ready “smart” stents to detect in-stent restenosis and occlusion. Adv. Sci. (Weinh.) 5, 1700560 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigo, B. et al. Soft implantable printed bioelectronic system for wireless continuous monitoring of restenosis. Biosens. Bioelectron. 241, 115650 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoare, D. et al. Predicting cardiovascular stent complications using self-reporting biosensors for noninvasive detection of disease. Adv. Sci. 9, 2105285 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • You, L., Shen, L. & Ge J. The foundation and development of China’s National Basic Science Center for panvascular interventional complex systems: pioneering device-vessel suitcordance research. Eur. Heart J. 46, 3400-3403 (2025).

  • Wang, L. et al. Ultra-sensitive wireless pressure sensor for real-time cardiovascular restenosis monitoring in smart stents. IEEE 38th Int. Conf. Micro Electro Mech. Syst. (MEMS), 12–15 (2025).

  • Xu, H. et al. Flexible tensile strain-pressure sensor with an off-axis deformation-insensitivity. Nano. Energy 99, 107384 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, M. et al. Flexible graphene field-effect transistors and their application in flexible biomedical sensing. Nano-Micro Lett. 17, 34 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Jackman, J. A., Ng, W. B. & Cho, N.-J. Flexible, graphene-coated biocomposite for highly sensitive, real-time molecular detection. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 8623–8630 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, J. et al. Ultrasensitive label-free MiRNA sensing based on a flexible graphene field-effect transistor without functionalization. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2, 1090–1098 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao, Z. et al. Measurement of cytokine biomarkers using an aptamer-based affinity graphene nanosensor on a flexible substrate toward wearable applications. Nanoscale 10, 21681–21688 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L. et al. A DNA-functionalized graphene field-effect transistor for quantitation of vascular endothelial growth factor. Sens. Actuators B. 351, 130964 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf, J. et al. Conducting Polymer-Infused Electrospun Fibre Mat Modified by POEGMA Brushes as Antifouling Biointerface. Biosensors (Basel.) 12, 1143 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S., Liu, W., Wu, Z. & Chen, H. Tri-functional platform for the facile construction of dual-functional surfaces via a one-pot strategy. Mater. Chem. B. 8, 5602–5605 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheng, D. et al. Phosphorylcholine/heparin composite coatings on artificial lung membrane for enhanced hemo-compatibility. Langmuir 39, 9796–9807 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., Chen, S., Chang, Y. & Jiang, S. Surface grafted sulfobetaine polymers via atom transfer radical polymerization as superlow fouling coatings. Phys. Chem. B. 110, 10799–10804 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y. et al. 5 years of serial intravascular imaging outcomes of XINSORB sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 12, 602–603 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang, H. et al. A bioresorbable dynamic pressure sensor for cardiovascular postoperative care. Adv. Mater. 33, e2102302 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X. & Ahn, J. H. Biodegradable and bioabsorbable sensors based on two-dimensional materials. J. Mater. Chem. B 8, 1082–1092 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Z. Synchrotron radiation computed tomography assessment of calcified plaques and coronary stenosis with different slice thicknesses and beam energies on 3D printed coronary models. Quant. imaging Med. Surg. 9, 6–22 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginn-Hedman, A. M. et al. Diffusible contrast-enhanced micro-CT improves visualization of stented vessels. Cardiovasc. Pathol. 60, 107428 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vennemann, B., Obrist, D. & Rösgen, T. A smartphone-enabled wireless and batteryless implantable blood flow sensor for remote monitoring of prosthetic heart valve function. PLoS One 15, e0227372 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalal, Z. et al. Long-term complications after transcatheter atrial septal defect closure: a review of the medical literature. Can. J. Cardiol. 32, 1315.e11–1315.e18 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Qiao, W. & Dong, N. Residual shunt and microthrombosis associated with new-onset migraine after transcatheter atrial septal defect closure. Eur. Heart J. 44, 4605 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Criscuolo, V. et al. Double-framed thin elastomer devices. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 55255–55261 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, X., Chen, A., Luo, Y., Zhang, C. & Zhang, E. Steerable catheters for minimally invasive surgery: a review and future directions. Comput. Assist. Surg. 23, 21–41 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Safian, R. D. Magnetic navigation: what’s the attraction?. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Interv. 84, 668–669 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Limpabandhu, C., Hu, Y., Ren, H., Song, W. & Tse, Z. T. H. Actuation technologies for magnetically guided catheters. Minim. Invasive Ther. Allied Technol. 32, 137–152 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. & Mehta, Y. Intraoperative aortic dissection. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 18, 537–542 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi, M., Cheng-Kuei, J. & Levesque, D. Flexible ultrasonic transducers. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 53, 1478–1486 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Manwar, R., Kratkiewicz, K. & Avanaki, K. Overview of ultrasound detection technologies for photoacoustic imaging. Micromachines (Basel) 11, 692 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. et al. High-frequency PIN-PMN-PT single crystal ultrasonic transducer for imaging applications. Appl. Phys. A. 108, 987–991 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, G. & Dencks, S. Ultrasound imaging. Recent Results Cancer Res. 216, 135–154 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, E. Y., Lee, H., Han, S., Kim, C. & Kim, J. Photoacoustic imaging systems based on clinical ultrasound platform. Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood.) 247, 551–560 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. et al. Bioadhesive ultrasound for long-term continuous imaging of diverse organs. Science 377, 517–523 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, M. et al. A fully integrated wearable ultrasound system to monitor deep tissues in moving subjects. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 448–457 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T. et al. Flexible thin-film PZT ultrasonic transducers on polyimide substrates. Sensors 21, 1014 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., Zhu, C. & Wu, D. Flexible and stretchable ultrasonic transducer array conformed to complex surfaces. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 42, 240–243 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X. et al. Sputtered ZnO film on aluminium foils for flexible ultrasonic transducers. Ultrasonics 54, 1991–1998 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, H. et al. A wearable cardiac ultrasound imager. Nature 613, 667–675 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, J. et al. Skin-adaptive focused flexible micromachined ultrasound transducers for wearable cardiovascular health monitoring. Sci. Adv. 11, eadw7632 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, D. H. et al. Silicon nanocolumn-based disposable and flexible ultrasound patches. Nat. Commun. 16, 6609 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • van Neer, P. L. M. J. et al. Flexible large-area ultrasound arrays for medical applications made using embossed polymer structures. Nat. Commun. 15, 2802 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, J. et al. Procedural simplification in mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair: full echocardiographic guidance and outcomes. IJC Heart Vasc. 59, 101730 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, J. et al. Embracing a new era of echocardiography-guided percutaneous and non-fluoroscopical procedure for structure heart disease. Med. Rev. 5, 174–176 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousonis, V. et al. The use of Intracardiac Echocardiography in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 26, 893–901 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Ji, Z., Yang, S. & Xing, D. Morphological-adaptive photoacoustic tomography with flexible transducer and flexible orientation light. Opt. Lett. 42, 4486–4489 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huynh, N. T. et al. A fast all-optical 3D photoacoustic scanner for clinical vascular imaging. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 9, 638–655 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, X., Chen, Y. H., Xia, F. & Sawan, M. Photoacoustic imaging for monitoring of stroke diseases: a review. Photoacoustics 23, 100287 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neprokin, A., Broadway, C., Myllylä, T., Bykov, A. & Meglinski, I. Photoacoustic Imaging in Biomedicine and Life Sciences. Life (Basel.) 12, 588 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, Y. et al. Visualising peripheral arterioles and venules through high-resolution and large-area photoacoustic imaging. Sci. Rep. 8, 14930 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. et al. Ultrafast longitudinal imaging of haemodynamics via single-shot volumetric photoacoustic tomography with a single-element detector. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 8, 712–725 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pashaei, V. et al. Flexible body-conformal ultrasound patches for image-guided neuromodulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 14, 305–318 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • de Oliveira et al. Development of a 2.25 MHz flexible array ultrasonic transducer. Res. Biomed. Eng. 35, 27–37 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, S. et al. Effect of aortic arch type on technical indicators in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting. J. Int. Med. Res. 47, 682–688 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. S., Schotten, J., van Mieghem, C., Kiemeneij, F. & Serruys, P. W. Magnetic navigation in percutaneous coronary intervention. J. Interv. Cardiol. 19, 558–565 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, J., Chen, J. & Lee, P. S. Functional fibers and fabrics for soft robotics, wearables, and human-robot interface. Adv. Mater. 33, e2002640 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, M. et al. Continuum robots: an overview. Adv. Intell. Syst. 5, 2200367 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Khairy, P. Robotic magnetic-guided catheter ablation: an emerging treatment for congenital heart disease. Future Cardiol. 21, 1–3 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aagaard, P. et al. Remote magnetic navigation: a focus on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 27, S38–S44 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Noten, E. lisabeth et al. Robotic navigation shows superior improvement in efficiency for atrial fibrillation ablation. J. Atr. Fibrillation 11, 2108 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Du, J. & Mao, Y. Hydrogel-based continuum soft robots. Gels 11, 254 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, W., Gao, W. & Wang, X. Magnetic flexible metastructures: developing smart shape-morphing capabilities at extremely low-temperatures. Compos. Sci. Technol. 269, 111242 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, R. et al. Dexterous helical magnetic robot for improved endovascular access. Sci. Robot. 9, eadh0298 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, A., Xu, R., Escoto, A., Ward, C. & Patel, R. V. Design of an ultra thin strain sensor using superelastic nitinol for applications in minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Int. Conf. Adv. Intell. Mechatron. (AIM) 2016, 794–799 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M. et al. A magnetically actuated microcatheter with soft rotatable tip for enhanced endovascular access and treatment efficiency. Sci. Adv. 11, eadv1682 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Veeram Reddy, S. R. et al. Invasive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (iCMR) for diagnostic right and left heart catheterization using an MR-conditional guidewire and passive visualization in congenital heart disease. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 22, 20 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, D. S. et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance-guided right heart catheterization in a conventional CMR environment – predictors of procedure success and duration in pulmonary artery hypertension. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 21, 57 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S. et al. MRI-guided robot intervention—current state-of-the-art and new challenges. Med-X 1, 4 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiryaki, M. ehmetE. fe et al. Magnetic guidewire steering at ultrahigh magnetic fields. Sci. Adv. 9, eadg6438 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S. N., McElhinney, P. & Gunamony, S. Ultra-high field MRI: parallel-transmit arrays and RF pulse design. Phys. Med. Biol. 68, 10 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskell, M. W., Nielsen, J. F. & Noll, D. C. Off-resonance artifact correction for MRI: a review. NMR Biomed. 36, e4867 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. et al. Design and development of novel MRI compatible zirconium- ruthenium alloys with ultralow magnetic susceptibility. Sci. Rep. 6, 24414 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue, R. et al. Novel biocompatible Zr-based alloy with low young’s modulus and magnetic susceptibility for biomedical implants. Materials (Basel) 13, 5130 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X. et al. Permanent fluidic magnets for liquid bioelectronics. Nat. Mater. 23, 703–710 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, R. et al. Small-scale magnetic soft robotic catheter for in-situ biomechanical force sensing. Biosens. Bioelectron. 270, 116977 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, S. et al. A magnetically controlled guidewire robot system with steering and propulsion capabilities for vascular interventional surgery. Adv. Intell. Syst. 5, 2300267 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, R. V., Atashzar, S. F. & Tavakoli, M. Haptic feedback and force-based teleoperation in surgical robotics. Proc. IEEE 110, 1012–1027 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, B. J., Bendok, B. R., Turcotte, E. L. & Batjer, H. H. Remote magnetic navigation enables precision telesurgery. Sci. Robot. 9, eado3187 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aird, W. C. Endothelial cell heterogeneity and atherosclerosis. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 8, 69–75 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stöger, J. L., Goossens, P. & de Winther, M. P. Macrophage heterogeneity: relevance and functional implications in atherosclerosis. Curr. Vasc. Pharmacol. 8, 233–248 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, Y., Wang, B. & Li, C. Sensors-based monitoring and treatment approaches for in-stent restenosis. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B 111, 490–498 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • van Werkum, J. W. et al. Long-term clinical outcome after a first angiographically confirmed coronary stent thrombosis: an analysis of 431 cases. Circulation 119, 828–834 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Subramaniam, Y. & Cayirci, E. Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Comput. Netw. 38, 393–422 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Niu, Q. et al. Toward the internet of medical things: architecture, trends and challenges. Math. Biosci. Eng. 21, 650–678 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Selvaraj, N., Nallathambi, G., Moghadam, R. & Aga, A. Fully disposable wireless patch sensor for continuous remote patient monitoring. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2018, 1632–1635 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, C. A. et al. Innovative intelligent insole system reduces diabetic foot ulcer recurrence at plantar sites: a prospective, randomised, proof-of-concept study. Lancet Digit. Health 1, e308–e318 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, S., Mohanty, S. & Ramadoss, A. Functionality of flexible pressure sensors in cardiovascular health monitoring: a review. ACS Sens 7, 2495–2520 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, R. et al. Applications of flexible electronics related to cardiocerebral vascular system. Mater. Today Bio. 23, 100787 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sim, K. et al. An epicardial bioelectronic patch made from soft rubbery materials and capable of spatiotemporal mapping of electrophysiological activity. Nat. Electron. 3, 775–784 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, K. et al. 2D material-based injectable sensor for minimally-invasive cerebral blood flow monitoring. Small 21, e2501744 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. et al. A noninvasive flexible conformal sensor for accurate real-time monitoring of local cerebral edema based on electromagnetic induction. PeerJ 8, e10079 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Q. et al. Optimization of LC sensor enabling wireless passive intracranial pressure monitoring. Microsyst. Technol. 25, 3437–3446 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, H. et al. Stretchable, implantable, nanostructured flow-diverter system for quantification of intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics. ACS Nano 12, 8706–8716 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stauss, M., Htay, H., Kooman, J. P., Lindsay, T. & Woywodt, A. Wearables in nephrology: fanciful gadgetry or Prêt-à-Porter?. Sensors (Basel) 23, 1361 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X. et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of early-stage chronic kidney disease and monitoring of the hemodialysis process in clinical practice via exhaled breath analysis using an ultrasensitive flexible NH3 sensor assisted by pattern recognition. ACS Sens 10, 2823–2839 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheson, B. T. et al. A novel, microvascular evaluation method and device for early diagnosis of peripheral artery disease and chronic limb-threatening ischemia in individuals with diabetes. J. Vasc. Surg. Cases Innov. Tech. 9, 101101 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonetta-Misteli, F. et al. Development and evaluation of a wearable peripheral vascular compensation sensor in a swine model of hemorrhage. Biomed. Opt. Express 14, 5338–5357 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shabani Varaki, E., Gargiulo, G. D., Penkala, S. & Breen, P. P. Peripheral vascular disease assessment in the lower limb: a review of current and emerging non-invasive diagnostic methods. Biomed. Eng. Online 17, 61 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, S. M. et al. Wearable and flexible sensor devices: recent advances in designs, fabrication methods, and applications. Sensors (Basel.) 25, 1377 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, H. R. et al. Advanced soft materials, sensor integrations, and applications of wearable flexible hybrid electronics in healthcare, energy, and environment. Adv. Mater. 32, e1901924 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nan, X. et al. Review of flexible wearable sensor devices for biomedical application. Micromachines 13, 1395 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W. et al. Neuromorphic sensorimotor loop embodied by monolithically integrated, low-voltage, soft e-skin. Science 380, 735–742 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W. et al. Recent progress in semi-implantable bioelectronics for precision health monitoring. Adv. Funct. Mater. 35, 2424463 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, J. et al. Semi-implantable bioelectronics. Nano-Micro Lett. 14, 125 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J. et al. Development of smartphone-controlled and microneedle-based wearable continuous glucose monitoring system for home-care diabetes management. ACS Sens. 8, 1241–1251 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, A. et al. Implantable flexible sensors for health monitoring. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 13, e2302460 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannata, J. M. et al. Development of a flexible implantable sensor for postoperative monitoring of blood flow. J. Ultrasound Med. 31, 1795–1802 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, M. et al. Implantable biosensors and their contribution to the future of precision medicine. Vet. J. 239, 21–29 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutry, C. M. et al. Biodegradable and flexible arterial-pulse sensor for the wireless monitoring of blood flow. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 3, 47–57 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Paula, B. Defining health equity. J. Nat. Med. Assoc. 114, 593–600 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabeen, T. et al. An intelligent healthcare system using IoT in wireless sensor network. Sensors 23, 5055 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Osama, M. Internet of medical things and healthcare 4.0: trends, requirements, challenges, and research directions. Sensors (Basel) 23, 7435 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, K., Jegadeesan, R., Guo, Y. & Thakor, N. V. Wireless power transfer strategies for implantable bioelectronics. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 10, 136–161 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao, Y. et al. Nanogenerator-based self-powered sensors for data collection. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 12, 680–693 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Obuchowicz, R., Strzelecki, M. & Piórkowski, A. Clinical applications of artificial intelligence in medical imaging and image processing-a review. Cancers 16, 1870 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni, P. A. & Singh, H. Artificial intelligence in clinical diagnosis: opportunities, challenges, and hype. JAMA 330, 317–318 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandeep Ganesh, G., Kolusu, A. S., Prasad, K., Samudrala, P. K. & Nemmani, K. V. S. Advancing health care via artificial intelligence: from concept to clinic. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 934, 175320 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezapour et al. Machine learning-enabled prediction of 3D-printed microneedle features. Biosensors 12, 491 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Madika, B. et al. Artificial intelligence for materials discovery, development, and optimization. ACS Nano 19, 27116–27158 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Riesel, A. E. et al. Crystal structure determination from powder diffraction patterns with generative machine learning. J. Am. Chel. Soc. 146, 30340–30348 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hachem, E. et al. Reinforcement learning for patient-specific optimal stenting of intracranial aneurysms. Sci. Rep. 13, 7147 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goerzen, D. et al. Machine perception liquid biopsy identifies brain tumours via systemic immune and tumour microenvironment signature. Nat. Nanotechnol. Published online December 24, 2025.

  • Ma, L. et al. Liquid biopsy in cancer: current status, challenges and future prospects. Sig. Transduct. Target Ther. 9, 336 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Z. et al. Magnetic control of a steerable guidewire under ultrasound guidance using mobile electromagnets. IEEE Rob. Autom. Lett. 6, 1280–1287 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kudithipudi, D. et al. Neuromorphic computing at scale. Nature 637, 801–812 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, M. et al. Reconfigurable neuromorphic computing: materials, devices, and integration. Adv. Mater. 35, e2301063 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Najim, A. et al. An IoT healthcare system with deep learning functionality for patient monitoring. Int. J. Commun. Syst. 38, e6020 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alharbe, N. & Almalki, M. IoT-enabled healthcare transformation leveraging deep learning for advanced patient monitoring and diagnosis. Multimed. Tools Appl. 84, 21331–21344 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. et al. Deep reinforcement learning: a survey. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 35, 5064–5078 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M., Shen, X. & Pan, W. Deep reinforcement learning for personalized treatment recommendation. Stat. Med. 41, 4034–4056 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Niraula, D. et al. A clinical decision support system for AI-assisted decision-making in response-adaptive radiotherapy (ARCliDS). Sci. Rep. 13, 5279 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, H. H. et al. Deep reinforcement learning for automated radiation adaptation in lung cancer. Med. Phys. 44, 6690–6705 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. et al. Deep reinforcement learning in radiation therapy planning optimization: a comprehensive review. Phys. Med. 125, 104498 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, L. Y. et al. Health system-scale language models are all-purpose prediction engines. Nature 619, 357–362 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarow, J. P. & Baxley, J. H. Medical devices: US medical device regulation. Urol. Oncol. 33, 128–132 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • link